|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/6/2008 9:07:51 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 675
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
On 26 September 1960, 70 million U.S. viewers tuned in to watch Senator John Kennedy of Massachusetts and Vice President Richard Nixon in the first-ever televised presidential debate. In substance, the candidates were much more evenly matched. Indeed, those who heard the first debate on the radio pronounced Nixon the winner. But the 70 million who watched television saw a candidate still sickly and obviously discomforted by Kennedy's smooth delivery and charisma. Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard. Studies of the audience indicated that, among television viewers, Kennedy was perceived the winner of the first debate by a very large margin.
So, will High Def TV change it more?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/6/2008 9:50:36 PM
|
|
|
saved9201
Posts: 265
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn
On 26 September 1960, 70 million U.S. viewers tuned in to watch Senator John Kennedy of Massachusetts and Vice President Richard Nixon in the first-ever televised presidential debate. In substance, the candidates were much more evenly matched. Indeed, those who heard the first debate on the radio pronounced Nixon the winner. But the 70 million who watched television saw a candidate still sickly and obviously discomforted by Kennedy's smooth delivery and charisma. Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard. Studies of the audience indicated that, among television viewers, Kennedy was perceived the winner of the first debate by a very large margin.
So, will High Def TV change it more?
Yeah. Most of us with high def TV's will be watching sports or cool movies instead of polyticks.
- Julius
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 8:34:10 AM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 675
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
Do you want to see this in High Def?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 10:51:33 AM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 675
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
And we sure don't want to be FORCED to take it or do without TV
And assist through your tax dollars others to continue to get tv after 2009, but I digress
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 11:35:45 AM
|
|
|
Pat-rebel_lady
Posts: 369
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn
quote:
And we sure don't want to be FORCED to take it or do without TV
And assist through your tax dollars others to continue to get tv after 2009, but I digress
Get ready for the conversion to Digital TV
NOTE: If you watch TV via cable or satellite, this information does not apply to you. You do NOT need a new TV, do NOT need a converter box, and you do NOT need to purchase any sort of upgrade.
When Does the Switch from Analog to Digital Broadcasting Happen?
The "Big Switch" from analog to digital broadcasting will be completed on February 17, 2009. The US Congress set this in motion, and television stations such as KING 5 have been preparing for this change since the mid 1990s. That means we have plenty of time to get you up to speed on all the changes, and help simplify the complexities of the transition to DTV.
If I Don't Have an High Definition Television Will I Still be Able to Watch Television?
Yes, you certainly will. If you currently have an HDTV, you are already enjoying digital television. If you don't plan on buying an HD set, you'll need a DTV "converter box" that transforms digital television signals to analog so that you can still watch stations such as KING 5. The converter boxes boxes will allow consumers to maintain their free, over-the-air television service even on older analog television sets. You will be available to purchase the boxes at a wide variety of electronics retailers early this year.
HERE
Now Comcast (our cable server) tells us we DO Need to have a converter box on our cable ready TV by Feb. of next year. I'm angry because no-body seems to know how to be straight these days with the truth.
< Message edited by Pat-rebel_lady -- 5/7/2008 11:43:33 AM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 11:41:53 AM
|
|
|
Pat-rebel_lady
Posts: 369
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TomTurn
On 26 September 1960, 70 million U.S. viewers tuned in to watch Senator John Kennedy of Massachusetts and Vice President Richard Nixon in the first-ever televised presidential debate. In substance, the candidates were much more evenly matched. Indeed, those who heard the first debate on the radio pronounced Nixon the winner. But the 70 million who watched television saw a candidate still sickly and obviously discomforted by Kennedy's smooth delivery and charisma. Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard. Studies of the audience indicated that, among television viewers, Kennedy was perceived the winner of the first debate by a very large margin.
So, will High Def TV change it more?
No!!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 11:55:44 AM
|
|
|
Leslie35
Posts: 657
Joined: 9/6/2007
From: SW Missouri
Status: offline
|
If people really go by looks then McCains wife had better not come on TV very often. She has what looks like a very bad face lift.
_____________________________
If I speak with the tongues of angels and have not love I am nothing but a clanging symbol. ~Love is patient and kind, Love is not ill mannered or easily angered.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 3:50:02 PM
|
|
|
stamper_ben
Posts: 10913
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lone Star State
Status: offline
|
Of course it is style over substance. PR firms get paid billions of dollars a year for this. All about "looking" presidential.
Juan will do good to stay off the tube in a straight matchup against Obama. it's pretty clear who is the better looking one, high-def or not...
_____________________________
"I think we cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations of the public opinion polls."
Dead Eye Dick Cheney
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 4:20:01 PM
|
|
|
SuspenseWriter
Posts: 147
Joined: 2/22/2008
Status: online
|
Speaking of which, has anybody ever seen that photo of McCain in college? Dang. Guy could have been a movie star. Seriously.
_____________________________
John Robinson
writer of suspense...obviously!
www.johnrobinsonbooks.com
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/7/2008 7:31:16 PM
|
|
|
TomTurn
Posts: 675
Joined: 3/13/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
Of course it is style over substance. PR firms get paid billions of dollars a year for this. All about "looking" presidential.
Juan will do good to stay off the tube in a straight matchup against Obama. it's pretty clear who is the better looking one, high-def or not...
When it comes to Obama, I have never heard anyone talk so much to say so little. But most people are won over by blah, blah like that and he will look 10 times better than McCain
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/9/2008 12:12:15 AM
|
|
|
lightshineon
Posts: 3305
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote]ORIGINAL: TomTurn
quote:
Of course it is style over substance. PR firms get paid billions of dollars a year for this. All about "looking" presidential.
Juan will do good to stay off the tube in a straight matchup against Obama. it's pretty clear who is the better looking one, high-def or not...
When it comes to Obama, I have never heard anyone talk so much to say so little. But most people are won over by blah, blah like that and he will look 10 times better than McCain
Ok not wanting to be unkind but Obamas lips in high def, They are purple, and his ears? Not that he is unattractive, but somehow his lips are purple. AA lips do not look like that, so no one take that personal. McCain is ok looking for an old man, except the wooden, nobody home look in his eyes. Now I feel mean, looks really should not matter.
_____________________________
Remember, whenever you have pearls, there are always plenty of pigs nearby who would be glad to step on them.
F.T., 2007
Be sure you vote for those, whose views you want your children to emulate.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/9/2008 8:31:03 PM
|
|
|
lightshineon
Posts: 3305
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Some reason I thought of this thread all day, obamas lips ( purple), and McCains wooden eye look. I am not photogenic myself, so I do not know why this thread is so interesting to me?
_____________________________
Remember, whenever you have pearls, there are always plenty of pigs nearby who would be glad to step on them.
F.T., 2007
Be sure you vote for those, whose views you want your children to emulate.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/9/2008 9:08:53 PM
|
|
|
saved9201
Posts: 265
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lightshineon
Some reason I thought of this thread all day, obamas lips ( purple), and McCains wooden eye look. I am not photogenic myself, so I do not know why this thread is so interesting to me?
If that's you in the photo, you're way too modest. Thats a great photo and if thats hubby, you two make a lovely couple. 
Back to the subject. I wrote earlier, half joking, that people with Hi Def TVs would be watching cool stuff rather than presidential debates. I was actually being serious. I grew up in the 60s before color TV and cable, so you only had a limited number of channels in your area (for a while, in Austin, TX, we had only 1). Plus, most households had only one TV. So, everybody watched whatever was on and so everybody watched the Kennedy-Nixon debates. My point is, we live in a different culture now. People have choices so probably not everyone will be watching Mr. Purple Lips, so physical appearances won't make as big an impact as they did in the past.
- Julius
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/9/2008 9:16:55 PM
|
|
|
lightshineon
Posts: 3305
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Thanks for the kind words Julius yes that is me, and husband. I do not want to make fun of Obamas lips, or McCains empty look, or Hillary ( well rather see than hear her) so it does not matter. You maybe right looking at Larry King, here I feel mean again, he is no Brad Pit, but would rather watch him. Debates do get old, and I should not make fun of anyones looks, I was not brought up that way. I do not know why this thread interested me so much. I was thinking about in the History books, and the debate with nixon, and how much it mattered. Obama is actually nice looking. No Danzel Washington, but he is handsome. I am feeling bad here, about what I said.  about his lips.
_____________________________
Remember, whenever you have pearls, there are always plenty of pigs nearby who would be glad to step on them.
F.T., 2007
Be sure you vote for those, whose views you want your children to emulate.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/10/2008 12:14:09 AM
|
|
|
wing2000
Posts: 848
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard.
...which is why I prefer to listen to or read the news.
Maybe we could have a radio only debate?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Will High Def TV change elections? - 5/10/2008 12:35:54 AM
|
|
|
lightshineon
Posts: 3305
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
yeah, that would be good. I like talk radio.
quote:
ORIGINAL: wing2000
quote:
Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard.
...which is why I prefer to listen to or read the news.
Maybe we could have a radio only debate?
_____________________________
Remember, whenever you have pearls, there are always plenty of pigs nearby who would be glad to step on them.
F.T., 2007
Be sure you vote for those, whose views you want your children to emulate.
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
. the picture clarity I've had, the screen width, and sound to our programs has been just fine!!, We don't need any dramatic new home-viewing experience!! And we sure don't want to be FORCED to take it or do without TV; What a crock of Horse Hockey!! 
