|
constitutional_con -> RE: Ron Paul: GOP's Last Chance? (6/9/2007 12:16:05 PM)
|
Actually, 45degreeN, Ron Paul is (R) TX and the former head of the Republican Liberty Caucus. He was the libertarian presidential candidate in 1988 - almost 20 years ago! - but because he is now an (R), that is why he is in the republican debates. Yes it is true that there are many Repubs who dislike and fear his message of smaller govt, lower taxes, constitutional nonintervention, states rights, etc, which is why there has been some noise about trying to get him out of the Republican debates - the Republican party of today is not the the same party Reagan and Goldwater belonged to. Who would have ever thought that the Republican party would stand for unlimited warfare abroad and endless spending at home, backed by open borders and grotesquely unbalanced budgets based on borrowing? But thats the party we have today. [:@] I watched the Republican debates of course and it seems to me that the other 9 candidates simply represent more of the same. From my POV it would be preferable to return to the party's roots and the Constitution. Of course I have Read Paul's positions, they are easily available on the web via google. Have you? quote:
ORIGINAL: 45degreeN Constitutional_con didn't you get it the first time. Ron Paul is the Libertarian party candidate even if he embodied all the Republican ideals he is still from another party. He would be a lame duck from the moment he set foot in the white house. With no senatorial party to support him and no congressional party to support him how could he get anything he wanted passed? constitutional_con have you read the Libertarian party web site, what their agenda is, or even done more than listened to the debates with him in them? I wondered the first time why he was in the republican debates, he should be removed before the next debate.
|
|
|
|