|
RingsofSaturn -> RE: Thoughts On Aliens... (7/22/2007 7:14:40 PM)
|
Hell all, This topic is quite an interest to me. I have personally always believed in this possiblity and am very open minded to this possibility. A few things peak my interest and are hard to dispute: 1. Eyewitness accounts. People from all walks of life, cultures and mentalities see or have seen UFOs for centuries. The numbers are impressive and on many an ocassion, lie detectors tests have been taken and passed in regards to sightings. Not everyone can be lying or hoaxing. 2. In the mid-90s the US Government, after being pressured by several key figures in UFO research, released 900 pages of information about UFOs from deep within CIA and FBI departments. 90% of it was blacked out. Imagine that... 3. Ancient art- could be the smoking gun. A simple Google search can yield several credible sites that show ancient art which shows UFOs carefully hidden in the forground or actual accounts recorded in the art of UFOs and ETs. How could someone imagine space travel, 500-700 yrs before the first airplane? I posted this on a another site and got these stats from a guy who is all into astronomy and physics. I saved it and have it here for viewing. I find it VERY interesting, mathematically. RE; UFOs and ETs I believe you. I saw a program, not an entertainment production, but a news production by our national state channel. I mean, hugely serious and non speculative. I think the occasion was the mars landing, or more likely the take off of the first mars whatyoucallit, sond or rocket, I don't really know what it's called in english. Anyway: This emotionless and dry scientist told that if you take all the stars in all the galaxies, and then only those that most likely is the center of a solar system with planets... You have an insane number of solar systems. He gathered that a certain amount of these would have planets in such a distance from such a sun that life would be possible. If we left out 90% of these, to allow for unexpected issues, and then concentrated on the 10% left... Out of these, they reckoned that a very small percentage would have a probability of harboring life, or letting it emerge (?). Even so, he took away another 90% of that small percentage (like 1 or less, can't remember), again to be on the safe side. Of those inhabitable planets, where life was granted, most would be inhabitable long before even plant life was present. Evolution would have too little time. Taking the minor percentage of remaining candidates, where inhabitable conditions would stay stable for billions of years, again cutting away 90% for good measure, he was left with something like 300.000 planets where there most likely would be intelligent life. Then he added: Of course, we can cut this down by another 90%, and we're left with 30.000 that has an even greater chance of containing intelligent life. And then there's the matter of the size of the universe. The known universe expands all the time... Maybe we acknowledge the existence of ten times as many stars in a few years? And then there's the question, he said, about whether life is something that is inevitable. If it is in the nature of chemistry to build those molecules given time... Then life would emerge eventually, on ALL hospitable planets. And we can always imagine that what we have thought as inhospitable conditions to our kind of life, may be hospitable to another kind of life... What then? Only one of these probabilities granted would propel the figures beyond the multi-million mark. If they are all proving to be true... What's your take on this? If we discover another cluster(?) of galaxies, or discover that what we've taken for the universe is a super-cluster of which there are many... The first time in modern history people thought they knew roughly how big the universe was... How many times bigger do we think it is today? 10 times? 100 times? What about a few years into the future? Will we discover that it's another 10.000 times as many stars out there as we have thought until now? Maybe not, but don't tell me this universe can't surprise us again. We've thought so many times that we knew the truth. Gee... this is a big topic!! Mathematically speaking, it is much more probable that there is life out there than that it's not. Likewise, it is not probable that we're the most or least developed of the worlds. We might be, but I think some are ahead and some are behind. Hence, those ahead can possess technology that makes things possible that we can't do today. Travel distances 10 billion times faster than us, for instance... I don't know. God Bless- ROS
|
|
|
|