|
Dancre -> RE: AUDIO: " The 9/11 Nuts " (9/23/2007 2:06:26 PM)
|
Well, first you need to look at the source, who is saying these things? What proof do they have? I've learned a lot of the so called quotes from the 9/11 conspiracies are taken out of context, only to promote their cause. When you look at the true quote or talk to the person being quoted, you find out it's only a game of "telephone". Now I went to a terrorist website, which is now gone, and there was a guy who recruited for the Al-Qada. He was stationed in England, but I think he was kicked out of the country. Anyway, he spoke of David Pearl whom the Al-Qada members beheaded. He saw the video and told why it was the terrorists who did it. He spoke of the way the man held the knife, what he said as he killed David, even the clothes the terrorists wore, proving it was the terrorists who killed him. And of course he called the killer a hero. Now this recruiter worked with the Al-Qada and knew more about them than anyone else.
Now if you look into the lives of the 9/11 conspiracy leaders, you'll see that they don't have the proper background to make their claims. Also, why would Marvin, who in charge of the security at the WTC, have anything to do with blaming Bush? To me, that doesn't make sense. It's not a connectable dot. Now if you intercepted emails from Marvin writing to Bush saying, We're ready, bring it on. All the right people are safe, whenever you're ready, then yes, you'd have a connectable dot.
What proof is there saying officials were told not to fly? Is there a memo from the president on presidential stationary, or just heresay? Are there emails, taped phone calls, someone who was told not to fly who can vouch for it? You have to follow the trail back to the source. Who is the source and what are their credentials?
So if someone says, officials were told not to fly on 9/11, then ask for the offical memo saying, don't fly on 9/11. If someone says, well we don't have it, then why trust it if there's no offical proof, no memos, no emails, nothing? I personally need documented proof saying officals were told not to fly. Does NORAD have documented proof that Chaney was conducting wargames? There should be documents, something proving he was doing this. What do the employees of NORAD say about this? Why were they doing it? Did it really happen? If Chaney was conducting wargames, then why? NORAD will have some kind of offical report for their records, what do those records say? I have no ideas what PNAC is, but again, go straight to the source, what offical documents are there stating we need another Pearl Harbor? You only have a small quote. What is the whole quote, the whole conversation? What was said and why?
I've learned that being a writer means taking responsibility for making the story as real as possible and doing my homework. Even if you have to take a year to track down one document, then do it for the sake of the story. Don't believe everything you hear. I didn't when I studied terrorism, I went straight to the source, the terrorists themselves and I learned a lot of frightening things.
You have to be careful with conspiracies. They are exciting, thrilling, a Tom Clancy novel and very easy to get sucked into. But you have to step back and see the whole picture, look at all the documents, all the proof, all the quotes in context in order to truly understand what is happening. Do your homework before believing anything or anyone.
kim
|
|
|
|
