|
SpongeBlog -> RE: Sabbath - One Stop Thread (9/6/2008 9:31:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LBolt I hear you... Why then did the Greek use Sabbatismos and not katapausis, which actually means rest? It's symbolic. A figure of speech, not a reference to the literal sabbath under the law. The word 'katapausis' (rest) is used repeatedly in the passage. The context of the whole passage is comparing the 'katapausis', or rest promised to the Israelites who came up out of Egypt with the promised 'katapausis' to those who believe the gospel of Christ: "3Now we who have believed enter that rest..." (Heb. 4:3) The Israelites could not enter their promised 'katapausis' (Canaan land) because of unbelief: "16Who were they who heard and rebelled? Were they not all those Moses led out of Egypt? 17And with whom was he angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the desert? 18And to whom did God swear that they would never enter his rest if not to those who disobeyed? 19So we see that they were not able to enter, because of their unbelief." (Heb. 3:16-19) "...11Let us, therefore, make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will fall by following their example of disobedience." (Heb. 4:11) Is the author telling us we too will not enter into Canaan land because of unbelief? Of course not. He's speaking figuratively. And he calls the 'katapausis', the rest that one enters into today when they believe, 'sabbatismos' (the one time it appears in the NT), not sabbaton, the Greek word used for the sabbath day in every other reference to the sabbath day in the NT. 'Sabbatismos' is the masculine noun of the common neutered noun 'sabbaton', which is the Greek word used through out the rest of the NT for the actual Sabbath day. He uses 'sabbatismos' to drive home the figurative nature of Christ being our 'sabbath' rest. A rest that we will not be able to enter into for the same reason the Israelites were not able to enter into their rest--unbelief. quote:
ORIGINAL: LBolt Why did Messiah teach soo much about Sabbath and how it is to be properly observed? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it's recorded that Jesus ever purposely discoursed on his own initiative about proper Sabbath keeping as the next order of business in his ministry of teaching people how they should live as children of God. On several occasions he was forced to defend his own actions on the Sabbath in response to the accustations of the Pharisees. I see what point you are trying to make, but there's no weight to your argument that 'Jesus taught much about proper Sabbath keeping, therefore it must be really important'. It came up when he was accused of breaking it. You don't have enough evidence, that I can think of, to defend your point. quote:
ORIGINAL: LBolt Why would the author of Hebrews, writing to a people who were already saved, speak of entering God's rest, since, according to your understanding salvation is the Sabbath rest? Why would the author want them, people already saved, to make every effort to enter "that rest" (salvation) when they've already entered the salvation rest? It's clear from the passage that the author did not suppose he was talking to already saved people. His hope was that they would in fact be saved: "12See to it, brothers, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called Today, so that none of you may be hardened by sin's deceitfulness. 14We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first." (Heb. 3:12-14) Feedback is usually pretty lacking on my posts, but don't you agree the author is not at all making the assumption all these people are saved, or at least were not in danger of falling away? quote:
ORIGINAL: LBolt I think, like I was in your shoes a little over a year ago, you and many in "Christiandom" have the flawed view and defense for not keeping Sabbath. You are walking in the flawed traditions of those who broke frrom the Catholic Church but still hold to the traditions she introduced. What's killing, I provide quotes such this, "The Catholic Church...by virtue of her divine mission, changed the day from Saturday to Sunday...you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify", and more of Catholic who admit that Sabbath to Sunday was their doing and you still want to defend broken doctrines. You really have to open your mind up a little. I'm not catholic. I and others don't think Sunday is the new sabbath day. Saturday is the day called sabbath. Many, many people in my camp know this. The point you're not seeing is we are no longer bound by the requirements to congregate, and rest from specific personal labors in a predefined way on the day called sabbath. I'm convinced that there is not one honest, serious christian alive who thinks we don't have to worship or praise God anymore, or meet with the brethren, or fast and pray at purposely set apart times as needed to seek the face of God, or enter into many other good and godly and useful disciplines. The thing you aren't getting is we don't have to do that anymore between the hours of 6pm on Friday and 6pm on Saturday! The blessing is in seeking the face of God, not in seeking him according to meaningless timetables and procedures. There is no special blessing for the person who does his good and beneficial things between those hours of the week--things that we all do. I'm not going to be banished outside the gates of Jerusalem because I wouldn't perform the same disciplines of the faith you perform during the times established by the law. That is what is so utterly inane (senseless and silly) about the law keeping argument. Those stipulations had their time and purpose. That time has passed. That is the argument I defend. Take the official declarations of the Catholic church up with them. I and others only defend the freedom they have from the restrictions of the OT worship laws. What they've done with that freedom is regrettable but it does not change the fact that we are free from the legislated restrictions on worship found in the OT law.
|
|
|
|