|
rosenon -> RE: Apologia (1/9/2008 4:09:30 PM)
|
Hi Everyone, For those of you getting ready to tackle the "Evolution versus Creation" module in your science studies. Here is a great vignette for you to consider: We often hear people say that the geological column "proves" evolution to be true. When I hear statements like this my ears go up. First of all, science does not "prove" anything. The best that science can do is provide evidence that supports an idea. Even something as well documented as the Law of Gravity is open to revision should new data come forth about the property; hence, science has to be open to change. We might be 99.9999999999% sure something works a certain way, but for the scientist that 0.0000000001% is enough possibility to give us pause to ponder. True, the geological column seems to be a record of how evolution occurred. To demonstrate it, a uniformitarian starts with very simple life forms in the oldest rocks and simply follows the fossils through to see how those life forms evolved into what is seen today. Of course, one must remember that the geological column itself is simply a theoretical construct. It doesn't actually exist anywhere. It is based on certain assumptions and a particular way of looking at the geological record. It assumes that each layer of rock on planet earth represents a period in earth's past, and it further assumes that the index fossils found in a given layer of rock are, in fact, accurate indicators of which time period the rock was formed. If either of these assumptions upon which geological column is based are not true, then column is in error and The Theory of Evolution, which is based on the correctness of the geological column, is not true, either. I provide the following web sites for you to consider: Ten Misconceptions About the Geological Column - http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=242 Top Nine Evidences against The Theory of Evolution -- http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/top.htm One final point. If I were to offer to bet you $100 that you could not answer a question and I told you that there was only 5% chance that you would be able to answer the question correctly, would you take the bet? Most of us would pass up this opportunity. Why? Because the chance of winning is so small. Uniformitarians basing their geologic and evolutionary assumptions on less than 5% of the total fossil record. The other 95% is composed of clams and other similar, hard-shelled creatures. Thus, what the geological column and evolutionary thought looks at is a tiny, tiny subset of the entire fossil record. I don't know if I would want to bet my eternal salvation on 5% of a worldwide fossil record, but people do it every day. I know it sounds nuts, and it is. We need to pray for these people. Hope that helps you as you study God's wonderful Creation. God Bless, Steve
|
|
|
|