|
backrowbaptist -> RE: Is church too feminine? (7/31/2008 12:46:29 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JimboFletch quote:
ORIGINAL: backrowbaptist quote:
ORIGINAL: JimboFletch Well expert on the woes of the Church, none of my challenges, sorrow, or pain have resulted from a few flowers or the keys of any songs or the color of the carpet. That much I can guarantee. I wasn't the one to bring those up in this thread. Neither was I. Flowers and tissues are symtomatic of much deeper issues, which, again, you seem unwilling to face. Doesn't take an expert to see it. Symptomatic of what, besides a bunch of sissy, whiney men? I haven't seen a thing that indicates a feminine Church, just excuses. Want me to face up, then get specific. I'm not sure how you can be hearing excuses when then men who are bringing up the problem are church attenders. Men who don't attend church don't see this as a problem. Again, you can acknowledge the problem, or you can have your sensibilities offended and call people sissies. Your choice. Specifically, the biggest problem I see with a feminized church is the inability to 'stand firm' against the pressures of unsound biblical teachings and political correctness. The more feminine (or liberal - they correlate) the church, the more likely they are to compromise, and not confront, false doctrines. I can't help but see a multi-pronged satanic attack on the church coming. The spearhead of the attack will be homosexual rights and gay marriage, along with liberation theology (under the guise of 'social justice') and multicultralism. Not to mention the looming threat of radical Islam. Will a feminine church be able to endure?
|
|
|
|