|
saved9201 -> RE: Should Hillary drop out now and support Obama? (5/15/2008 6:26:36 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rnershigh Clinton, on the other hand, was more confident, had answers that clearly showed she at least put some thought behind her answer. She didn't pepper her answer with the "uhs" either. Of the two, Clinton had better answers and although I don't really like her or support her, I was more impressed with her response than Obama's. So I think, if Obama were the Democratic nominee and were to go up against McCain in a debate, everyone will see the big difference between the two and that he really isn't all that great anyways. Anyone can say change and let's make a difference, but what is he really saying? Nothing all that awe-inspiring. I've been saying basically the same thing in much earlier posts. In fact, I said from the start that I didn't think Obama was smart enough to be president. If people would just focus on him and what he says (or dosen't say), and not so much on his preacher, his "weird name" or his neighbors, then they'd see what really disqualifies him, like his naivete' regarding foreign policy and the economy. But as I also said earlier, we live in a Jerry Springer world, where people love the juicy stuff and substantive issues are just too complicated. Because some don't want to take the time to deal with complicated substantive issues that matter, they try to convince themselves (and others), that things like the "gotchas" (i.e., the "bitter" comment), Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers and anything his wife says, are what's important. I've been saying all along, and I'm not the only one, I've talked to plenty of people, black people, who say that there's plenty substantive evidence out there that clearly affirms that Obama is not close to being ready to be leader of the free world. Hillary Clinton couldn't have spoken truer words that when she stated early in the campaign that she and John McCain bring experience to the job, and all Obama brings is a speech. - Julius
|
|
|
|