|
GrahamCracker -> RE: Why do so many people reject water baptism (4/9/2008 6:12:09 PM)
|
GreatDivide said:quote:
In the Bible baptism is considered to be not something we do, but something God is doing. It is indeed "the working of God" (Colossians 2:12). So much for you fuzzy thinking. Water baptism IS something that man does--as commanded by God. The sentence structure in Col. 2:12 contains a passive verb. The subject of the verb is unnamed. How does that make the agent of the baptism God? "I baptize with water, but there comes one after me who will baptize with the HS." (Matt. 3:11). The agent there is a man, John the Baptist. I could quote others. restored08 said in post 17 quote:
Well how do you explain John 3:5. Nobody seems to be able to do that. Because to me is means just what it says. And if it means exactly what it says to you then you also reject Jesus. Well, I have discussed it many times. Great Divide can attest to that. With regard to insisting that it "means what it says," be careful what you insist on. It says "unless a man is born of water and of Spirit" NOT "unless a man is born of baptism and Spirit." I note that with 47 posts credited to your username, even if some of them have been deleted you have not been around CW for very long. I have discussed the subject of baptism many, many, many times--ad infinitum. I do believe the Bible is the word of God. quote:
It's like they don't believe entirely in the word of God. There is scripture backing up the importance of water baptism. Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he can not enter into the kingdom of God. John 3:5 Or maybe that they believe it just as strongly but have a different interpretation. Ps103 said quote:
Larry--yes, the thread (at least the posts that flabbergasted me) leaned toward your #1. They claim water baptism was never required--only baptism of the Holy Spirit. They were not discussing Baptism as salvic/non-salvic. Well, anything is possible I suppose. I do get a little annoyed by those who insist that when the immersion medium isn't explicit that it must be the baptism of the HS. I would insist that whent the immersion medium isn't explicit, that most likely it is talking about water baptism. mcleod said in post #20quote:
Well I have and they are called Grace fellowship. They have a college in Grand Rapids MI. which and I attend one of their gatherings for awhile. I believe also they have a college in Milwaukee WI. They go by what is stated in Ephesians ch 4 starting in verse 4 There is one body and one Spirit-just as... If they're teaching it a college, then it must be established "doctrine" in some circles, just as Ps103 says. I'll have to take it under advisement. Thanks for the info. rileykins said in post 23quote:
The baptism that the Apostle Paul taught was a baptism into Christ. This baptism is the placing of the believer today into the Body of Christ.... Not seeking to quibble, seeing's how rileykins and I agree on probably a lot more than we disagree. I simply disagree with the substance of the post. URForgiven said in post 25quote:
We need to remember that every time we see the word "water" in the Bible it does not mean water baptism. And every time we see the word "baptism" in the Bible it does not mean water baptism. Generally, when water is not explicitly mentioned as the baptism medium, I tend to interpret it as intending to mean water. Only when some other medium is expressly mentioned do I interpret it NOT to mean water.
|
|
|
|