|
Jhud -> RE: When does personhood begin? (4/11/2008 11:58:55 AM)
|
quote:
Once implanted, the actions of the mother can have an impact on the development and viability of the fetus. Pre-implantation, there is no external human impact that I know of which determines if an embryo will spontaneously abort or not. The 3 month old fetus has a chance at surviving to birth and therefore may be ensouled even though it dies. Was it a waste of a soul? One might look at it that way. Just as one may see all the aborted babies as "wastes" of souls. But, as I pointed out, I am not convinced so much that ensoulment takes place at an invariable point in all pregnancies. My contention is mostly that it doesn't happen prior to implantation. Of course, once a person is born, they obviously have a soul (whether they act like it or not). So, the premie and the 1 year old are irrelevant to a discussion of something that clearly happens at some time prior to birth. The point being, as soon as you start trying to assign ‘ensoulment’ to a particular set of physical circumstances (the mothers actions, implantation, etc.) you ascribe to it a biological component that is neither justified by Scripture or biology. In short, we would be guessing; and we shouldn’t relegate human life to guesses. quote:
Certainly not. Now, from a development standpoint, I do not know at what point in the process the conjoining takes place. In other words, I don't know if it is a pre-implantation or post-implantation event, or even if there is a general rule. Having said that, I do know there is the possibility, albiet rare, of twining happening post-implantation. I expect God is sufficient enough to handle those extreem situations. Certainly; which is why the argument that we can’t ascribe ensoulment to a particular point of the development of humans holds true, and thus we shouldn’t act on what we don’t know. quote:
I think that is pretty much what I concluded with. I do separate personhood and ensoulment simply because the former is specifically used in a consitutional and legal context whereas the latter is almost exclusively a spritual concern. I agree with this distinction.
|
|
|
|