|
john_mark -> RE: Could Jesus have sinned? (5/6/2008 1:47:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: drmark Aww, john_mark, am I that poor a communicator of Wesleyan/Holiness theology? There is NO WAY we can be "truly, perfectly sinless" in this lifetime. That is completely a divine attribute reserved for our glorified existence in Heaven. We may obtain perfection (the ability to not sin) and we may live in that perfection (being holy), but both come ONLY by God's sanctifying grace and His keeping grace. Grace is ALWAYS "done by God" - our miniscule part in grace is to appropriate and apply it. Without the power of God, sinless perfection is doomed! Now at what point would did I answer differently than you, john_mark? drmark, i was trying to be sure not to answer for you. i wasnt trying to place doubt on your theological viewpoint, it is just that i dont know enough about it to comment rightly about it. i am sorry if i came across that way. my response was based on the fact that i am not sure that we obtain sinlessness in heaven apart from being kept by God. i understand that in this life we walk by grace, but when we are glorified in heaven, in realtion to sin will we still walk by grace or will we have the power to be sinless in and of ourselves without grace? quote:
was he kept by the power of God or did He do it on His own? i think the question is unanswerable What is wrong with BOTH as the answer? Isn't our sanctified holiness a partnership with God? Surely no one thinks God lives our lives for us, but He must live in, with, and through us. i agree that our holiness is a partnership with God. absent the parternship failure ensues, so it could not be done on our own. when we read the gospels we read of Jesus prayers to the Father so it appears that Jesus also needed that partnership for sucess. iow He didnt find everything He needed for sucess within Himself even though He was God. if sucess for Jesus depended on the Father, then the possibilty for failure exisited, or there would be no need for the partnership. sorry, i know i am rambling, but as we pursue this question deeper i am beginning to look at this in different ways.
|
|
|
|