|
Amputee-Devotee -> RE: Is it OK to be attracted to amputees? (5/8/2008 3:19:58 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: techne well, a fetish is variously defined (as far as is relevant to this context) as: - something, such as a material object or a nonsexual part of the body, that arouses sexual desire and may become necessary for sexual gratification Obviously since I'm not married I try not to let anything about a woman arouse me sexually, but I guess you could say that an amputee's stump does have that effect on me. But not really any more than a nice set of legs (or even their good leg), or breasts, or buttocks, or stomach, or any other part of a well formed woman's body. quote:
- an abnormally obsessive preoccupation or attachment; a fixation - a form of sexual desire in which gratification depends to an abnormal degree on some object or item of clothing or part of the body; "common male fetishes are breasts, legs, hair, shoes, and underwear" - an object or bodily part whose real or fantasized presence is psychologically necessary for sexual gratification and that is an object of fixation to the extent that it may interfere with complete sexual expression are any of these things true or applicable? I don't think any of those are true. The first one is the closest to being true, but "abnormal degree" is pretty subjective. Is it abnormal if whenever i invision my future wife I always imagine her having one leg. It's not like I think I absolutely NEED that it's just that that is the form that my idealized future wife takes. I don't really think that would be any diferent then always invisioning your future wife as having blonde hair or something. The second and third ones on the list aren't true either. I'm still attracted to two-legged women just fine, and to date all the women I've ever taken interest in have been two-legged. Nothing serious ever really worked out, but that had nothing to do with the fact that they had two legs. I find one-leggedness to be a very attractive feature, but by no means do I consider it the be all end all of looks. Put an average looking amputee and an exceptionally beautiful two-legged woman side by side and I'd tell you the two-legged woman is better looking. I would say that having one leg would make any woman more attractive, but two women would have to be fairly close in overall looks for me to say the less attractive womans' one-leggedness made her more attractive than the two legged woman. quote:
ORIGINAL: THEREDCAPE Are you attracted to women who are amputees, or are you attracted to the missing limb? If you are sexually aroused by women, normal. If you are sexually arounsed by a prostetic device or the area of the limb that is now missing, you may want some counseling of a profesional . (Psychologist, not prostetic maker) I'd say both. I find women who are amputees attractive, and I find their stump attractive (you could even say "sexually arousing" but like I said earlier I try not to think like that since that would be lust). It's not prosthetic, as I find amputees more attractive without a prosthetic. But, I also find the rest of their bodies attractive and it's not like I find a full set of legs UNattractive, just slightly less so. Why would I need a psychologist for that? It's not liek it's screwing up my life or something. By that logic shouldn't every man need a psychologist if they find a certain part of a woman's body to be generally more attractive than others? Don't virutally all (honest) men prefer 1 part of the body above all the others? What would be wrong with me preferring an amputees stump? Granted, it isn't exactly a natural part of the body but on a two legged woman I generaly find her legs to be her most attractive feature, so I guess I just prefer legs (or lack thereof) in general. quote:
As a disabled woman, I think wanting someone because of a disability is just as bad as rejecting them for that reason. My husband knew he couldn't marry an able-bodied woman without jeopardizing his benefits (he's also disabled), so in that respect he needed to make disability a criteria in selecting a bride, but that's vastly different from being a devotee. It's best to look for a person with godly qualities regardless of disability. I wouldn't want a woman because of her disability any more than someone who wasn't attracted to amputees would want someone simply because of their beauty. It might play a role, yes, but first and foremost I would want a woman because she was godly, and then because she was intelligent, fun, caring, etc. etc. etc. It's just that I would prefer she also only have one leg. If she does, awesome! A nice bonus. If not, no biggie, she's still an awesome person and I'm sure I'd find her very beautiful. quote:
What the OP describes is a paraphilia. I'm not sure what type it's called, but it's a fixation with an object that arouses ones sexual thoughts. It's called acrotomophilia (i told you i've researched this alot).
|
|
|
|