|
figmentPez -> RE: Unintentional Sins - How Are They Forgiven? (5/14/2008 7:26:35 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: drmark quote:
I honestly thought that your definition of Christian perfection depended on it being impossible to sin without intent. quote:
A sin of ignorance is any wrong action that is made when someone is unaware that their action was sin. Okay, thanks, fig, I'm really trying to understand your position here. I have never stated on any thread anywhere that it is impossible for a sanctified Believer living in Christian perfection to never sin. Thus, your thought was a "wrong action", however you contest it's qualification as sin. So, what makes an action sin or why is an action sinful? Well, on other threads you have said it is possible for a Christian to be completely surrendered to God and to always act perfectly in every deed doing exactly as if God were acting Himself. However, you also denied that perfect knowledge goes along with that. So I guess I'm a little confused as to how someone can have imperfect knowledge and yet still act perfectly without sin 100% of the time. That, however, would seem to be off-topic at this point, since we're not talking about the avoidance of unintentional sin, but what is done about those sins. When I said "wrong action" I didn't expect to be taken so literally. I assumed that my reference to that "wrong action" being a sin that wasn't known to be a sin, would be sufficient to explain that I wasn't talking about any an all incorrect actions, but specifically those wrong actions that are against God. It's hard enough to come up with a working definition of sin that can be summed up in a sentence, let alone a paragraph, and adding in "unintentional" only makes it that much harder to succinctly describe what is a violation of God's perfect Law (not just the Mosaic Law, but the actual standard that God desires). I'm not sure how I can phrase a definition of sin to avoid all misunderstanding. My understanding of your beliefs was incorrect, but I have no idea if I sinned because of my ignorance. I did not knowingly prejudice myself against you, or otherwise intentionally fail to love you, as God would have me do, because of my failure to understand your doctrinal stance. However, it is possible that I did fail to follow the perfect course of action that God would have had me do, if my knowledge had been perfect. I'm not concerned about my human frailty, because God is bigger than my mistakes. quote:
quote:
Sins made in ignorance are forgiven the same way as any other sin. By grace through faith. But that's not what Numbers 22 says about how to be forgiven of unintentional sins. When did the mechanism for forgiveness change? Bluethread says he should follow Job's regular custom. Is he wrong? Is that a sin of ignorance if he is wrong? The mechanism for forgiveness did not change, because the sacrifices of the OT never truly provided the forgiveness of sin, unintentional or not, "For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." (Heb 10:4) All the sacrifices of the OT were faithfully looking forward to God providing the ultimate sacrifice. The sacrifices of the OT were about faith and obedience. Bluethread, who denies the triune God, has more serious doctrinal issues than what he believes about Job's sacrifices. However, it is likely his rejection of the revealed nature of the true God has led him to false belief in many other areas. It would be clearcut to call Bluethread's proposal sin if he were claiming that another sacrifice besides Christ were necessary to forgive sin, but that doesn't seem to be the case. However, he still could be wrong that God would desire animal sacrifice any longer, and if he taught contrary to what God would command, then that is sin. Hebrews 13 does talk about acceptable sacrifices "And do not neglect doing good and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is pleased." (Heb 13:16)
|
|
|
|