RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the difference?
View related threads:
(in this forum
| in all forums)
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/9/2008 8:09:21 AM
|
|
|
1love1God1way
Posts: 2401
Joined: 5/16/2005
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JimboFletch quote:
ORIGINAL: 1love1God1way No, they don't. They were very stout 5-point calvinists. That's really strange to me. Most people criticize 5-Point Calvinists as not having enough rules to govern their lives and are more prone to enjoying life in Christ than the garden-variety Pentecostal, they just don't tend to have overly exuberant worship services. I know. My experiences have been completely backwards. I went from that to a loose AoG church rules wise, but very conservative in doctrine and stance. Now I am interning at an AoG church that is tighter in rules, and looser and more liberal in doctrine and politics.
_____________________________
love.ben
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/9/2008 2:10:48 PM
|
|
|
Covaan_Meshuga
Posts: 3643
Joined: 6/8/2005
From: a mother who let me live
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: laura... quote:
* It teaches that they have the "whole truth" while SOME other organizations have some truth. * The members still believe that those who leave that church will go to hell, and some of the preachers will still say so from the pulpit. I would call it "cult". Definition of charismatic from Apologetis Index, http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c48.html: Persons, churches, movements, etc., affirming the belief that speaking in tongues is a gift of the Holy Spirit that may and should be manifested in the church today. These persons, churches, and movements are generally part of institutions and denominations that did not originate out of the original Pentecostal movement. Definition of cult from Apologetics Index, http://www.apologeticsindex.org/c09.html: According to the sociological definition: ...include consideration of such factors as authoritarian leadership patterns, loyalty and commitment mechanisms, lifestyle characteristics, [and] conformity patterns (including the use of various sanctions in connection with those members who deviate). Definition of pentecostal from Apologetics index, http://www.apologeticsindex.org/p00.html: Persons, churches, movements, etc., affirming the belief that speaking in tongues is the primary or exclusive initial evidence of the spiritual blessing known as the baptism in the Holy Spirit; or, those in historical continuity with and general agreement with the twentieth-century movement characterized by this initial-evidence doctrine. These persons, churches, and movements are generally part of institutions and denominations that originated out of the original Pentecostal movement in the early 1900s. So, according to these definitions, it is pentecostal, as they claim, but other definitions say that charismatic ideas started in the '60, emanating from already established churches. According to this definition, it is charismatic, because the church is not at all as it was up to the '60s. Furthermore, its leaders who died before 1970 would not recognize it today for several reasons, some of which I named above. Of course, I recognize that time changes ideas and responses to ideas, but some of the changes are recognizably unbiblical. Further, as time went on, I watched the adherers to their doctrine progressively display more dedication to the organization and to "authoritarian leadership patterns, loyalty and commitment mechanisms, lifestyle characteristics, [and] conformity patterns (including the use of various sanctions in connection with those members who deviate)." Well, it was a matter of curiosity on my part, and I guess these definitions answered my questions.
< Message edited by Covaan_Meshuga -- 6/9/2008 3:58:08 PM >
_____________________________
Abiyah "Ladies and gentlemen, there are things that you will only be able to learn by the weakest among us, and when you snuff them out, you are the one that loses." ~~Gianna Jesson, 1977 LA, CA, saline abortion survivor
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/9/2008 3:40:11 PM
|
|
|
iwillfearnoevil
Posts: 4192
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: offline
|
why don't you supply us with the answer for this particular chruch.
_____________________________
Photoblogging My Life
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/9/2008 3:53:54 PM
|
|
|
Covaan_Meshuga
Posts: 3643
Joined: 6/8/2005
From: a mother who let me live
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: iwillfearnoevil why don't you supply us with the answer for this particular chruch. I'm sorry! I thought I had in the last three paragraphs. Humorously, I guess it's a pentechariscult. It seems, to me, to follow all definitions.
_____________________________
Abiyah "Ladies and gentlemen, there are things that you will only be able to learn by the weakest among us, and when you snuff them out, you are the one that loses." ~~Gianna Jesson, 1977 LA, CA, saline abortion survivor
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/11/2008 9:17:01 PM
|
|
|
M-Paul
Posts: 12
Joined: 6/10/2008
Status: offline
|
Pentecostals are Christians who believe that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is evidenced by speaking in tongues, and other doctrine relating to experiencing the power of God as literally represented in the Bible. Charismatics are 1. an extreme form of Pentecostalism; or 2. an experience of Pentecostal power within a congregation but originating outside of and extending beyond the supervision of a particular church government. WOF is a movement that arose within Pentecostal circles, that created a new doctrine on how to experience the power of God by the words ones speaks, apparently under the influence of Christian Science teachings. I am a Classical Pentecostal, meaning I believe in the theology as formulated and taught at the Azusa Street Revival, which is completely different than WOF. We emphasize that the power of God is experienced by emptying oneself of the ways of the world, and by denying the natural man, which makes greater room for receiving the guidance of the Holy Spirit. These classifications are simple and basic, but understanding them to a large extent depends on whether a person just wants to understand them. M-Paul
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 8:19:50 PM
|
|
|
map4
Posts: 80
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JimboFletch In brief and to me, Pentecostal is a denominational tag, like Baptist or Methodist. Charismatic transcends denominations, it's anyone that believes in certain spiritual gifts largely not evident in non-pentecostal churches. Charismatics can belong to RCC, Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, or any other denomination. WOF are cults that teach a servant or bellhop god whose job is to provide whatever is commanded. They believe Jesus saved us in order to make us happy and pampered. None of the WoF people I know think this way or do these things. Not debating, just stating the difference of what I know and what is stated in this post.
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 8:32:29 PM
|
|
|
map4
Posts: 80
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bluestone So some Pentecostals believe that a second work of grace is necessary for Salvation, with a particular gift to prove it, others may think the second work of grace is optional? Or that a variety of gifts would be evident, not just a particular one? How would that vary from Charismatics? WOF people believe all that, plus you have to send in money to a ministry? No. WoF, or at least the ones I know, believe Jesus is the only way to the Father. Nothing else is needed for salvation. We do believe in the gifts of the Spirit. I have personally heard many WoF preachers and not one single one asked for money or said you had to give to their ministry for God to do anything for you. WoF are real people with real feelings and real problems just like everyone else. The are not just TV personalities.
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 8:41:36 PM
|
|
|
map4
Posts: 80
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OLEEguacamole the term pentecostal used to be used more for all who felt what happened in acts during pentecost was still valid for today. the drift away from the term pentecostal to charismatic was i think to be differentiated from the rules based, doctrinally different pentecostal type churches. wof is a subset of charismatic. wof is really a small deviation from charismatic thought. yes an important deviation, but there is so much in common with wof it often feels and sounds the same to long time charismatics. as important as some of the false doctrines pointed out today are, it's not the center of what is heard. it's not jumping out to established believers because it's subtle and not heard that much. try telling a wof that their favorite preacher said something wrong doctrinally about Jesus. chances are they haven't heard it. these things are not a big focus in church meetings etc. for over 40 years i have known many friends and family that are charismatics. some like many of the wof people. some like the elijah list stuff. most of the charismatics i know LOVE reading their bible. but in charsimatic churches preaching does not usually lean toward layering in basic doctrine and bible knowledge. it is geared more toward christian living. it used to be sunday school was full of doctrine, bible memorizing and knowledge etc but these days sundayschool is more about christian living too and the future generations will not have the same foundation as their fathers and grandfathers. this is not just a charismatic thing, but it is having a strong impact on the charismatic group IMO. as for salvation issues, charismatics believe the grace gifts are a bonus so to speak. not salvic. granted some hardcore might wonder if you REALLY loved God if you didn't want that stuff, or think that your walk was like a soda that lacked carbonation, but still, not salvic. keep in mind, the other side has their opinions of the charismatic's walk too. My WoF church does teach basic doctrine and bible knowgledge. Along with chrisitian living. It all goes together. Our pastor is led by the Holy Spirit, not by what other WoF leaders may say or do. We don't blindly follow any man. Just want all to know that I am not debating. I can only speak for that which I know. I don't presume to know all about denominations that I am not involved with.
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 8:46:06 PM
|
|
|
map4
Posts: 80
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: windlover44 I think this is a good thread. I was brought up in a Fundamental faith background, but my Grandmother was definitely Spirit-filled, and I testify to that by her lifestyle. A blood-bought Saint, and walked the walk. I believe by the grace of God that is why the Holy Spirit can influence my decisions. Why this? Well, I've tasted what I believe is a well-rounded mixture of Assemblies of God...Charismatic, and Word of Faith. I think what I've learned is "Have we not One God and Father?"...& "It is he who works in us to will and do of His pleasure." People believe in Pentecost...if we didn't, how could we believe the Bible is true...if we call Pentecost (ACTS 2) a lie, then we call God a liar. If we believe Pentecost, we can have charmisa [which in America if you have charisma you're usually a jubilant person..."The joy of the Lord is my strength."], and living Word of Faith people, well Hebrews 4:12 says "the Word of the Lord is quick, powerful, sharper than any two-edged sword, dividing joints and marrow, soul and spirit, and discerning the thoughts and intents of the heart." So, Word of Faith are people who pursue "the Living Word", as I was taught. Combine them properly, wouldn't that just be a living church? And if God didn't raise up things to challenge us and cause us to believe he is real, would we then "all grow unto a mature person, who is one in Christ?" Maybe we're just not looking at the big picture because we aren't accustomed to God doing something new. Well, the book of Isaiah says, "Behold, I will do a new thing...now it springs forth.", and if you're New Testament prone only, Hebrews teaches "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.", which fully supports a living God doing a new thing in our day, who never changes, for if Christ truly came then He is He who was birthed from the same prophet who proclaimed "a new thing." If God is God, then he can do anything, and if we understand and move in His love and obedience of His Word, then we are in living faith, and if we have One Lord, we will only have one Teacher, and if the Teacher is right, how can we argue, when we only have One Truth to follow? Not just maybe he will raise up his bride, I think is the greater question...but the fact that He is preparing her and she is going to shine! Nice post!
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 8:52:11 PM
|
|
|
map4
Posts: 80
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: M-Paul Pentecostals are Christians who believe that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is evidenced by speaking in tongues, and other doctrine relating to experiencing the power of God as literally represented in the Bible. Charismatics are 1. an extreme form of Pentecostalism; or 2. an experience of Pentecostal power within a congregation but originating outside of and extending beyond the supervision of a particular church government. WOF is a movement that arose within Pentecostal circles, that created a new doctrine on how to experience the power of God by the words ones speaks, apparently under the influence of Christian Science teachings. I am a Classical Pentecostal, meaning I believe in the theology as formulated and taught at the Azusa Street Revival, which is completely different than WOF. We emphasize that the power of God is experienced by emptying oneself of the ways of the world, and by denying the natural man, which makes greater room for receiving the guidance of the Holy Spirit. These classifications are simple and basic, but understanding them to a large extent depends on whether a person just wants to understand them. M-Paul WoF does not teach that you experience God by the words you speak nor are we influenced by Chrisitan Science. Just by the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Unfortunately people have a misconstrued idea of the majority of WoF people because of a few flakes out there. I guess this could be true of any denomination though.
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/12/2008 9:41:55 PM
|
|
|
MrFribbles
Posts: 1722
Joined: 1/29/2007
From: Hawaii, but I've moved around since then
Status: offline
|
quote:
My WoF church does teach basic doctrine and bible knowgledge. Just to make sure everyone's on the same page - how would you define the basic doctrines and bible knowledge?
_____________________________
You're a door without a key, A field without a fence. You've made a holy fool of me, And I've thanked you ever since. - Aaron Weiss
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/13/2008 10:54:25 AM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 5668
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: M-Paul Pentecostals are Christians who believe that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is evidenced by speaking in tongues, and other doctrine relating to experiencing the power of God as literally represented in the Bible. Charismatics are 1. an extreme form of Pentecostalism; or 2. an experience of Pentecostal power within a congregation but originating outside of and extending beyond the supervision of a particular church government. WOF is a movement that arose within Pentecostal circles, that created a new doctrine on how to experience the power of God by the words ones speaks, apparently under the influence of Christian Science teachings. I am a Classical Pentecostal, meaning I believe in the theology as formulated and taught at the Azusa Street Revival, which is completely different than WOF. We emphasize that the power of God is experienced by emptying oneself of the ways of the world, and by denying the natural man, which makes greater room for receiving the guidance of the Holy Spirit. These classifications are simple and basic, but understanding them to a large extent depends on whether a person just wants to understand them. M-Paul Nice post, I would just add one thing, Classic Pentecostals (trinitarian), aslo put a great deal of emphesis on living a Godly life. The Charasmatics seems less concerned with living a Godly fife and more concerned with goosebumps, and the WOFers seem to never mention living a Godly life at all (unless one considers being rich as Godly). Thanks RC
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion Read the first chapter of my latest book here; http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/13/2008 11:38:34 AM
|
|
|
Ps103
Posts: 11690
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: Here, now
Status: offline
|
MODERATOR'S NOTE :: ATTENTION PLEASE This thread is to determine the differences among Pentecostals, Charismatics and WOF. To discuss WOF generally, please use THIS thread. Thanks! Please do not reply to this message within the Community. Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns. Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.
_____________________________
Fasten your seatbelts...it's going to be a bumpy night.
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/13/2008 12:17:39 PM
|
|
|
rcjames
Posts: 5668
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrFribbles quote:
My WoF church does teach basic doctrine and bible knowgledge. Just to make sure everyone's on the same page - how would you define the basic doctrines and bible knowledge? That might be a little difficult since Chraismatics can be Roman Catholic, Luthern, Baptist, or any other basic denominations. And who knows what the WOFers belive? Pentecostals generally believe in salvation by faith through Grace unto Good works as in; (Eph 2:8) For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: (Eph 2:9) Not of works, lest any man should boast. (Eph 2:10) For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. Pentecostals are usually arminian in scope. Pentecostals usually believe that none of the gifts of the Holy Spirit have "Passed away" Someone else will have to speak to Charismatics and WOFers. Thsnks RD
_____________________________
Just a country Preacher's humble opinion Read the first chapter of my latest book here; http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
|
|
|
|
RE: Pentecostals, WOf, & Charasmatics: What's the diffe... - 6/13/2008 12:26:28 PM
|
|
|
Covaan_Meshuga
Posts: 3643
Joined: 6/8/2005
From: a mother who let me live
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Definition www.apologeticsindex Word-Faith Movement Also known as "Name-in-Claim-it," "Health and Wealth Gospel," "Positive Confession," "Word of Faith," etc. Word-Faith teachers owe their ancestry to groups like Christian Science, Swedenborgianism, Theosophy, Science of Mind, and New Thought--not to classical Pentecostalism. It reveals that at their very core, Word-Faith teachings are corrupt. Their undeniable derivation is cultish, not Christian. The sad truth is that the gospel proclaimed by the Word-Faith movement is not the gospel of the New Testament. Word-Faith doctrine is a mongrel system, a blend of mysticism, dualism, and gnosticism that borrows generously from the teachings of the metaphysical cults. The Word-Faith movement may be the most dangerous false system that has grown out of the charismatic movement so far, because so many charismatics are unsure of the finality of Scripture John MacArthur, Charismatic Chaos, p. 290 There are many perculiar ideas and practices in the Faith theology, but what merits it the label of heresy are the following: 1) its deistic view of God, who must dance to men's attempts to manipulate the spiritual laws of the universe; 2) its demonic view of Christ, who was filled with "the Satanic nature" and must be "born again in hell; 3) its gnostic view of revelation, which demands denial of the physical senses and classifies Christians by their willingness to do so; and 4) its metaphysical view of salvation, which deifies man and spiritualizes the atonement, locating it in hell rather than on the cross, thereby subverting the crucial biblical belief that it is Christ's physical death and shed blood, which alone atone for sin. All four of these heresies may be accounted for by Kenyon's syncretism of methaphysical thought with traditional biblical doctrine" D.R. McConnell, A Different Gospel (Just ignore the spelling in this site. Wish they had proofed their work. I don't spell or type perfectly all the time either.)
_____________________________
Abiyah "Ladies and gentlemen, there are things that you will only be able to learn by the weakest among us, and when you snuff them out, you are the one that loses." ~~Gianna Jesson, 1977 LA, CA, saline abortion survivor
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|