|
lw9 -> RE: Fools following fools (6/15/2008 5:20:57 PM)
|
quote:
FurGodWurLivin: lw9, allow me to ask simply... why did Peter feel it necessary to mention that those in the upper room were not drunk "as you suppose"? It would seem to a logical, thinking type person such as yourself, that this would necessitate that those witnessing this event had reason to believe the twelve were drunk. I've seen this one passage ripped out and abused time and time again to defend 'drunk in the spirit', and it's a completely fallacious conclusion. Here's why: 1. Acts 2:5 Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 7 Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language? 9 Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10 Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11 (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" 12 Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?" 13 Some, however, made fun of them and said, "They have had too much wine." 14 Then Peter stood up with the Eleven, raised his voice and addressed the crowd: "Fellow Jews and all of you who live in Jerusalem, let me explain this to you; listen carefully to what I say. 15 These men are not drunk, as you suppose. It's only nine in the morning! Fact: The apostles were in complete control of themselves. They were not falling down or stumbling around or acting drunk. Fact: Everyone could hear them clearly in their own language. They were not slurring their speech or laughing uncontrollably. Peter is in full possession of his faculties and his vocabulary when he addresses the mockers. Fact: The mockers were commenting specifically on the fact that everyone was understanding what they said in their own language. Bottom line: The mockers could not explain it, so they made fun of it. 2. Drunkenness is a SIN. The Bible states it plainly enough: Gal 5:19 The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Cor 6:9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; Neither the sexually immoral nor idolater nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. God commands sobriety: 1 Thess. 5:6,8; 1 Tim. 3:2,11; Titus 1:8; 2:2,4,6; 1 Pet. 1:13; 4:7; 5:8 Yet you want us to believe that God goes against His own word and brings a 'blessing' of drunkenness on His faithful??? No way. 3. Christians are called to self-control: Ac 24:25 As Paul discoursed on righteousness, self-control and the judgment to come, Felix was afraid and said, "That's enough for now! You may leave. When I find it convenient, I will send for you." Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faitfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. 2 Pet 1:5 Now for this very reason also, applying all diligence, in your faith supply moral excellence; and in your moral excellence, knowledge; 6 and in your knowledge, self-control, and in our self-control, perseverance…6 God even specifies who will be without self-control: 2Ti 3:2 For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, 4 treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God... If a manifestation is leading someone to behave in a sinful manner and is contradictory to God, then it's not the Holy Spirit at work, period. There are only two choices here: Believe the Bible, or believe people who contradict the Bible, but no one can have it both ways. Let's replace 'drunk in the spirit' with something else from the Galatians & Corinthians list of sins and see how this sounds: Debauchery in the Spirit Envy in the Spirit Orgy in the Spirit Witchcraft in the Spirit Prostitution in the Spirit Adultery in the Spirit Does that sit well with you? If not, then 'drunk in the Spirit' shouldn't sit well with you, either. What's next? Cocaine in the Spirit? Meth in the Spirit? Heroine in the Spirit? Sure... why not. quote:
The Bible is far from a comprehensive list of all things "good", and it is also far from a comprehensive list of all things "bad". So the question then becomes, is it automatically wrong if it isn't spelled out in the Bible? Absolutely not. However, it seems that is the main argument against physical manifestations of "the spirit". The Bible lists the gifts of the Holy Spirit quite clearly enough and there is no justification to go beyond that and start adding to that list. The Bible also describes the behaviors of those truly filled with the Holy Spirit, and drunken behavior is not part of the description. Considering that 'drunk in the spirit' is specifically listed as a judgment and condemnation but is found nowhere as a blessing or a gift, I will take the Bible's word over your word.
|
|
|
|