|
Digrieze -> RE: Stairway To Heaven (6/28/2008 9:03:17 PM)
|
I hate to say it, but as a musician I'd have to vote for both. Insofar as vocals go it's hard to beat "Bohemian Rhapsody". In fact, even Queen didn't try to do some of it live, they just projected the video above the stage and faded their live play out before the really nearly impossible vocals in the "Gallileo" section, they'd take a break, sip water, relax, etc, The exception seemed to be Brian May who was often seen improvising over the top, even if the guitar was muted (I always wanted to hear what he was noodling out of the "red special" back then). You can't blaime them, that vocal studio performance is a masterpiece that will probably never be replicated. Must be tough to set a standard of excellence like that and know the odds of doing it live are low. On the other hand you've read my comments early on about "Stairway To Heaven". I'd have a hard time imagining a more complex interweaving of musical rhythm and melody demanding the most of the musician to perform. As long as musicians are really interested in mastering either vocals or their instruments neither song will pass into obscurity. Personally I think that even non musicians are more sophisticated than most people give them credit for. For an interesting view of this you might want to read "Musicophilia" by Oliver Sacks. Sacks examines why the brain responds the way it does to music. Interesting theories, I don't know if they're accurate, but he certainly gives reasonable explanations to many of the responses we see, both in secular gigs and in churches that do the "tribal hypno-dance" worship style.
|
|
|
|