|
Real_Solitude -> RE: The Ultimate Sacrifice (7/6/2008 6:58:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Konstantinos That wasn't the question though. From the phrasing the question seems to be, "For whom would you give up your life in order to save theirs?" It's a question of simple exchange. It's either your life, or theirs. The OP termed this the ultimate sacrifice. I was saying that it would be more of a sacrifice to be tortured for the rest of your mortal days than to be given a swift death. The parent scenario you pose deviates from this. You're not choosing to live and suffer for the other person. You're choosing to live and suffer because it's what you want. Because you want to spend more time with your child. Because you want to watch them grow up. You're choosing to live with pain because you will also gain a form of joy from it. The child in your scenario is in no danger, there is no exchange, and therefore there is no a sacrifice. The correct version of the scenario would be more along the lines of telling a parent that they have to sacrifice something in order for their child to live. They are given two choices of the punishment they will endure. They can either take a bullet to the head, guaranteeing an easy, clean, instant, painless death. Or they can be whipped, chained, beaten, cut, pulled, burned, and generally tortured for the rest of their lives with no hope of ever seeing their child again. Either way they're not going to see the child again. Either way they're giving up their life so that that child may live. The difference lies in a world of torture, or an easy death. Simply dying for someone is not the ultimate sacrifice. Living for them is. Death is easy, and comes to us all. It is enduring for the sake of another person, with no hope of recompense, that is harder part of love.
|
|
|
|