quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

Actually, the logic of your example should demonstrate to you the illogic of thinking that warm temperatures have anything to do with the explosion of phyla, body plans, structures and systems. Animals and plants 'appear' on Volcano Island because said animals and plants already exist elsewhere.

quote:

Though, in a sense, I agree with you about 'miracles' in as much as one equates miracles with magic - where we differ is that the understanding that the life in the Cambrian required something more than warmth (or time, or any ordinary process). This is not only logical, but necessary.

quote:

What it required was the knowledge and intention of a mind. That's pretty straightforward, and certainly reasonable.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud
Well, I agree that modern science excludes non-materialistic explanations, but that it does so does not mean there is not evidence for such things, or that they constitute better explanations.

quote:

And while I am not sure how pi points towards God (Although if you ever saw the movie Pi, it suggests as much ) I think the universal constants certainly indicate the universe was no accident.

quote:

When an island is cleared of all life, it's fertile ground for new life to come in. Seeds randomly land on the island, and eventually, seeds that can survive in the soil start growing there and form the plant life that can eventually support the animal life.

quote:

Over the past 5000 years, humans have evolved to the point where Moses had more in common with Neanderthals than he did with modern humans. If we can evolve that quickly in 5000 years, surely we can have an explosion of life- given a few million. Indeed, that tends to be the case after any major cataclysmic event on earth.

quote:

Well, research shows that it's pretty natural for evolution to accelerate after a cataclysmic event or when there's lots of competition (actually, these usually tend to happen both at the same time), so at least to many natural historians, seeing a burst of evolution immediately after a 150 million year period where earth was void of life except for a few volcanic vents and a narrow band around the equator where algae could grow isn't necessarily a big of a suprise. We saw similar periods of evolution after the Permian-Triassic extinction and the Cretacious-Tertiary extinction.

quote:

Well, the Sun being a God named Ra is certainly straightforward and reasonable, as well. But ultimately, science usually has a better explanation.

I guess my real question here is why God would suddenly decide to blatantly leave his fingerprints over the fossil record where he hasn't in other areas of science.

quote:

Science can't explain why random processes on earth are effective at producing life- and why cataclysmic events that lead to periods of increased evolution happen at just the right times to facilitate the development of intelligent life. However, it generally is good at finding the holes, gaps, and questions about whether (at least seemingly) random natural processes were in control of earth's natural history.

quote:

Well, I think the first thing we need to realize is that if we're going to teach modern science in our classrooms, we probably shouldn't be teaching the supernatural.

quote:

Well, the real question here is why is pi 3.14159? Why not 3.14157? Well, like every number, it had to have come about in one of three ways:

1.) It had to have come from another number. (1)
2.) It had to have come from a function that takes numbers as inputs. (1)
3.) It had to have come from a random distribution that is defined by a function that requires numbers. (Saying "Pick a random number" doesn't make sense unless you tell me how to pick it- and you need a function with numbers in it to do so.) (2)
4.) It had to have been picked by something.

You'll note that the only way to really get another number is to either have a number or "pick" one. At some point, a number- or a set of numbers had to have been "picked". We call this thing that picked these numbers that provide the numerical basis for our Universe God.

I can formalize this as a proof- at least to standards good enough for most Computer Science/Algorithms research if you need me to. (A graduate level mathematician would be disappointed, however.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

Well, the real question here is why is pi 3.14159? Why not 3.14157? Well, like every number, it had to have come about in one of three ways:

1.) It had to have come from another number. (1)
2.) It had to have come from a function that takes numbers as inputs. (1)
3.) It had to have come from a random distribution that is defined by a function that requires numbers. (Saying "Pick a random number" doesn't make sense unless you tell me how to pick it- and you need a function with numbers in it to do so.) (2)
4.) It had to have been picked by something.

You'll note that the only way to really get another number is to either have a number or "pick" one. At some point, a number- or a set of numbers had to have been "picked". We call this thing that picked these numbers that provide the numerical basis for our Universe God.

I can formalize this as a proof- at least to standards good enough for most Computer Science/Algorithms research if you need me to. (A graduate level mathematician would be disappointed, however.)

<This explanation/proof is copyright blessedinnyc and may not be used in any way, shape, or form by the Discovery Institute or as material in a science class (philosophy class is OK; evangelism to hard-nosed "atheism is more logical than theism" folks is also OK).>[/size=1]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Veritas

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

Well, the real question here is why is pi 3.14159? Why not 3.14157? Well, like every number, it had to have come about in one of three ways:

1.) It had to have come from another number. (1)
2.) It had to have come from a function that takes numbers as inputs. (1)
3.) It had to have come from a random distribution that is defined by a function that requires numbers. (Saying "Pick a random number" doesn't make sense unless you tell me how to pick it- and you need a function with numbers in it to do so.) (2)
4.) It had to have been picked by something.

You'll note that the only way to really get another number is to either have a number or "pick" one. At some point, a number- or a set of numbers had to have been "picked". We call this thing that picked these numbers that provide the numerical basis for our Universe God.

I can formalize this as a proof- at least to standards good enough for most Computer Science/Algorithms research if you need me to. (A graduate level mathematician would be disappointed, however.)

<This explanation/proof is copyright blessedinnyc and may not be used in any way, shape, or form by the Discovery Institute or as material in a science class (philosophy class is OK; evangelism to hard-nosed "atheism is more logical than theism" folks is also OK).>[/size=1]

Where did you get those three (or four) ways for a number to come about? In mathematics, numbers don't "come about." They are assumed to exist. Alternatively, all numbers can be constructed from just the null set using the axioms of set theory.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Veritas
Where did you get those three (or four) ways for a number to come about? In mathematics, numbers don't "come about." They are assumed to exist. Alternatively, all numbers can be constructed from just the null set using the axioms of set theory.

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
Well, I think the first thing we need to realize is that if we're going to teach modern science in our classrooms, we probably shouldn't be teaching the supernatural.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud
All of which has nothing to do with the origin of phyla.

quote:



Hmmm..in what sense do you think humans have 'evolved' beyond Moses? What do you base this on?

quote:

In fact, people today are genetically more different from people living 5,000 years ago than those humans were different from the Neanderthals who vanished 30,000 years ago, according to anthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin.

quote:

In Europeans, there is a gene that makes them better able to digest milk as adults. In Asians, there is a gene that makes ear wax more dry.

quote:

Actually, research seems to show that cataclysmic events are pretty detrimental to most life. But none of this of course explains the origin of numerous novel phyla - association isn't cause.

quote:

God's fingerprints seem to be all over the universe, from the structure of galaxies down to the molecular code in every living cell. I don't think one has to look that hard.

quote:

I don't doubt mathematical concepts are a product of design, but why would it make a difference from the perspective of God's existence if pi was 3.14157? Why not 3.14159? I sincerely don't understand your reasoning here. I mean pi is rounded down at any decimal place.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc
Well, I think the first thing we need to realize is that if we're going to teach modern science in our classrooms, we probably shouldn't be teaching the supernatural.

Not just probably . . .

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
\
Actually nothing is assumed in mathmatics and there is a proof for everything. The concept of zero was unknown in the west until introduced by Islamic mathmaticians (interestingly enough though the Aztecs also had this concept and had a more accurate calendar too). Science (good science anyway and this excludes environmental science) NEVER assumes anything. Because you know what they say about assuming! [;)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc

quote:



Hmmm..in what sense do you think humans have 'evolved' beyond Moses? What do you base this on?

We have essentially evolved into a different species, according to research by Hawks of UW Madison and Harpending of the University of Utah:

quote:

In fact, people today are genetically more different from people living 5,000 years ago than those humans were different from the Neanderthals who vanished 30,000 years ago, according to anthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin.

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN1043228620071210?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews&rpc=22&sp=true

In particular, we find the creation of new information in a few genes:

quote:

In Europeans, there is a gene that makes them better able to digest milk as adults. In Asians, there is a gene that makes ear wax more dry.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
My kids go to public school where they learn about science in a godless fashion and that's OK.

quote:

It up to me to bridge the gap left by science that is filled by God

quote:

ORIGINAL: Veritas
Incorrect. The axioms are assumed without proof. There is no proof that there is a number 0 such that a + 0 = 0 + a = a. It is assumed without proof. There is no proof that a + b must equal b + a. It is assumed for commutative systems and not assumed for non-commutative systems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02

I find it odd that the same parents who don't want public schools to even mention sex to their kids because it's too personal, nonetheless want religion taught to them in biology class.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
My kids go to public school where they learn about science in a godless fashion and that's OK.

. . . In fact, I would say that it is necessary, otherwise science has no discipline without parameters.

quote:

It up to me to bridge the gap left by science that is filled by God

Exactly.
I find it odd that the same parents who don't want public schools to even mention sex to their kids because it's too personal, nonetheless want religion taught to them in biology class.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
My kids go to public school where they learn about science in a godless fashion and that's OK. It up to me to bridge the gap left by science that is filled by God.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Veritas

quote:

ORIGINAL: mapachito13
\
Actually nothing is assumed in mathmatics and there is a proof for everything. The concept of zero was unknown in the west until introduced by Islamic mathmaticians (interestingly enough though the Aztecs also had this concept and had a more accurate calendar too). Science (good science anyway and this excludes environmental science) NEVER assumes anything. Because you know what they say about assuming! [;)]

Incorrect. The axioms are assumed without proof. There is no proof that there is a number 0 such that a + 0 = 0 + a = a. It is assumed without proof. There is no proof that a + b must equal b + a. It is assumed for commutative systems and not assumed for non-commutative systems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TaoPoohBear
As the father of 2 teenage boys I'd say - Science at school, religion at home, and sex education EVERYWHERE & ALL THE TIME.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02

quote:

ORIGINAL: TaoPoohBear
As the father of 2 teenage boys I'd say - Science at school, religion at home, and sex education EVERYWHERE & ALL THE TIME.

. . . The right kind of sex education, that is!
Many already get the "everywhere and all the time" kind . . .

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marcus.
What transitional fossils are you referring to?

There are too many to list.

quote:

I remember studying many different types of macro/microfossils, some of which are identical to modern species.

No. Ancient fossils are not 100% identical to modern species; although, some are very similar.

quote:

It's called the Precambrian Explosion.

The Cambrian explosion does not disprove the age of the earth.

quote:

I was pointing it out as a fraudulent example. I've read that some school districts have the textbooks with it as fact in them still.

Some high school text books are not worth the paper that they are printed on.

quote:

And yes I know scientists corrected that error/fraud.

And that is all that matters: it proves that science is self-correcting, contrary to creationists' claims.

quote:

Yes I know again. These fraudulent attempts should remain in the textbooks so the students have a balanced understanding that some researchers are willing to use fraud to prove their theories and obtain funding.

No. The afore-mentioned frauds were not committed by scientists, but rather by hucksters looking for publicity and a quick buck. They did not "prove" anyone's theory except, prehaps, P.T. Barnum's.

quote:

You keep bringing up creationism with me when I haven't.

You apepar to be defending creationism in the classroom. That is the theme of this thread.

quote:

Before about 580 million years ago, most organisms were simple

Note the word "most", not all.

quote:

In the following 70 million to 80 million years, the rate of evolution accelerated by an order of magnitude,2 and the diversity of life began to resemble today’s.

Or else fossils became exceedingly more abundant; this is also a distinct possibility.

quote:

The long-running puzzlement about the appearance of the Cambrian fauna, seemingly abruptly and from nowhere

No. Fauna does not appear "out of nowhere" within the fossil record.

quote:

Interpretation is difficult

. . . Therefore, conclusions based on it are inconclusive.